Hardware Selection
A comprehensive guide to selecting the right hardware for AI/ML workloads. Compare GPUs, TPUs, CPUs, and specialized accelerators based on your use case, budget, and performance requirements.
π― Hardware Decision Framework
Choose hardware based on your primary workload type. Different AI tasks have vastly different requirements.
LLM Inference
Running pre-trained models for text generation
Model Training
Training or fine-tuning models from scratch
Computer Vision
Image classification, detection, segmentation
Embeddings & RAG
Vector generation and similarity search
β‘ Accelerator Types Comparison
| Type | Best For | Pros | Cons | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GPU | General AI/ML | Best ecosystem, CUDA | Expensive, power hungry | H100, A100, RTX 4090 |
| Google TPU | Large-scale training | Cost-effective, scalable | GCP only, JAX/TensorFlow | TPU v5e, TPU v4 |
| AMD GPU | Budget training | Lower cost, ROCm growing | Limited ecosystem | MI300X, RX 7900 XTX |
| Apple Silicon | Local dev, inference | Unified memory, efficient | Mac only, limited training | M3 Max, M3 Ultra |
| Intel Gaudi | Training at scale | AWS integration, cost | Newer ecosystem | Gaudi 2, Gaudi 3 |
| AWS Inferentia | High-volume inference | Low cost inference | AWS only, limited models | Inferentia2, Trainium |
π’ NVIDIA GPU Selection Guide
π» Consumer GPUs (Best Value)
24GB VRAM, 83 TFLOPS. Best bang for buck. Runs 7B-13B models locally.
~$1,600 | Best for: Local inference, fine-tuning small models
16GB VRAM, 49 TFLOPS. Good for 7B quantized models.
~$1,000 | Best for: Development, smaller LLM inference
16GB VRAM, budget option. Runs 7B Q4 models well.
~$450 | Best for: Entry-level AI development
π’ Datacenter GPUs (Production)
80GB HBM3, 990 TFLOPS. Fastest for training and inference. FP8 support.
~$30K or ~$4/hr cloud | Best for: Large model training, high-volume production
80GB HBM2e, 312 TFLOPS. Industry standard. Widely available in cloud.
~$15K or ~$2-3/hr cloud | Best for: Training, 70B inference
24GB, 121 TFLOPS. Efficient inference. Great for cost-conscious production.
~$0.70/hr GCP | Best for: Cost-efficient inference at scale
π Use Case β Hardware Mapping
| Use Case | Min. VRAM | Recommended GPU | Monthly Budget |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local LLM (7B) | 8GB | RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | $0 (own hardware) |
| Local LLM (13B-34B) | 24GB | RTX 4090 | $0 (own hardware) |
| Fine-tuning 7B (LoRA) | 16GB | RTX 4080 / L4 | ~$500 |
| Production Inference | 24-80GB | L4 / A10G / A100 | $500-$2,000 |
| 70B Model Inference | 80GB+ | A100 80GB / 2x L4 | $1,500-$3,000 |
| Full Training (7B+) | 80GB+ | H100 / 8x A100 | $10,000+ |
| Embeddings Generation | 4-8GB | CPU / T4 / L4 | $100-$300 |
π Key Hardware Metrics
Performance Metrics
Determines max model size. 24GB = 13B FP16, 80GB = 70B FP16
Critical for LLM inference. HBM3 (H100) >> GDDR6X (RTX)
Training speed. Look at FP16/BF16 TFLOPS, not FP32
Practical Considerations
H100: 700W, RTX 4090: 450W. Factor in electricity costs
NVLink (400GB/s) >> PCIe (64GB/s). Critical for training
H100s scarce. Reserve capacity or use spot/preemptible instances
π³ Quick Decision Tree
Running locally or in cloud?
β Local: RTX 4090 (best value) or Mac M3 (power efficient)
β Cloud: Continue to Q2
Training or inference?
β Training: A100/H100 (multi-GPU), TPU v4 for large scale
β Inference: L4 (cost), A10G (balanced), H100 (speed)
Budget constraint?
β Tight: Spot instances, Inferentia2, or quantized models on smaller GPUs
β Flexible: H100 for best performance, reserved instances for discount